Why the death of postmodernism is the opportunity of a lifetime.

Postmodernism is officially dead, and its passing presents one of the rare times in history when the culture is actively seeking what the church can offer.

After reading this article on the death of postmodernism, I began mulling over how the flow of culture has shaped the church. It occurred to me that the changing culture has presented the church with an opportunity it hasn't had for at least a century. (I also realized that the traditional conservative church is a modern entity. That may be a surprise - after all, we pride ourselves - with great humility, of course - on being "old-fashioned." But historically, "modern" refers to the age following the "medieval" age - in other words, about the 1500s or later, and the traditions held by today's conservative church are much more recent than that. But I digress.) A brief survey of the last 150ish years will help us understand today's church and the opportunity that we have.

The modern age is, by all understandings, an age of exploration and discovery, of understanding and applying principles.  This can certainly be seen in the arts - though the styles changed, up till about the mid 1800s most paintings were realistic representations of what can be seen around us, and they generally followed consistent rules of form, contrast, harmony, etc. A little later but similarly, American culture emphasized the idea of an ideal American family - Dad works to support the family, Mom stays home with the rambunctious but well-meaning kids, they live in a nice house in the suburbs, everything is always well-kept and orderly - the "American dream." (Think "Leave It To Beaver" or "Father Knows Best") In the mid-1800s, Charles Finney proposed "new measures" or principles for evangelism - get and hold people's attention by an energetic and entertaining preaching style, use the "anxious seat" or altar call to press for conversions, hold "protracted meetings," use music to involve the congregation and to set the mood for the service. His methods caught on and continue to be used today in many conservative church circles.

 In some circles, the idea of applying principles was taken to extremes. For example, "modern art" intentionally distorted the realistic element of art in order to emphasize the underlying principles of art - form, contrast, balance, flow, feeling, impression.  The church growth movement studied why some missions and churches grow while others don't in order to find the underlying principles of church growth. The application of these principles created the "mega-church" with membership in the thousands.

In the 1960s the hippie movement threw off traditional values and expectations, and by the 1970s postmodernism was in full swing. At its heart, postmodernism rejects any single overarching worldview and instead accepts all views as equally valid. This movement started early in the arts, and is seen in bringing together discordant or contradictory elements, such as Marcel Duchamp's "Fountain" (actually a urinal) or Andy Warhol's screen printings of Campbell's soup cans. In music, Madonna emphasizes the religious connotations of her name by wearing crucifixes while her music celebrates materialism and immorality. In the church world, postmodernism took two forms - extreme ecumenism advocates accepting all religions as equally valid, and the emergent church intentionally deconstructs the traditional understandings of church and replaces them with a wide variety of views and approaches.

But now with the death of postmodernism, we find ourselves in the post-postmodern world. And while it is difficult to discern a trend while it is still ongoing, the movement seems to be in the direction of authenticism. In opposition to the sterile principles of modernism and the gloomy confusion of postmodernism, authenticism searches for the real, the solid, the thing of genuine value. The movement has already impacted architecture, music and art. You can see authenticism in stores like Whole Foods or restaurants that specialize in fresh local produce. Even WalMart is in on the action with its "Good. Works." campaign that emphasizes its involvement in the local community.

Authenticism has affected the church in a number of ways, many or most of them positive.  There is an increased desire for fellowship - not just social events, but the genuine, deep, honest fellowship which is so vital in the NT picture of the church. The proliferation of small groups, accountability groups, discipleship groups - call them what you may - is one outgrowth of this desire.

There is also a growing dissatisfaction with the usual "methods" of doing church and a renewed interest in what the Bible actually teaches and how to apply it. Instead of simply holding to the traditional methods and understandings of church, we are examining ourselves and our traditions in light of Scripture. This is very different than the rebellion of the 1960s or the "deconstruction" of the emergent church. It's an honest examination of ourselves and our traditions in order to find and hold to those things that truly matter and let go of those things that are useless or even detrimental to the church. Even a few CHM churches, such as Victory Chapel in Indianapolis and OKC Bible Methodist in Oklahoma City, are consciously re-defining themselves in an attempt to better fulfill Christ's command to disciple all people.

Another welcome aspect of authenticism in church is an increased willingness to acknowledge and deal with the tough realities that people face. A growing number of pastors and youth leaders are addressing formerly taboo subjects like pornography, substance abuse, depression, marital problems, homosexuality and molestation. We are realizing that genuine Christianity works in the real, ugly world.

So the conservative church is returning to her Scriptural foundation to find authentic Christianity in the midst of all the traditions and approaches that she has inherited, and at the same time the world is engaged in a search for authenticity among the rubble of extreme modernism and postmodernism. God has brought us this incredible opportunity. Are we willing to examine ourselves and our churches in light of Scripture? Do we have the courage to live out Scripture even in the face of opposition? Do we dare to passionately embrace authentic Christianity and present it to a world desperate for authenticity? 

Understanding Satan's Schemes

The other day as I was reading my Bible, I was struck by this phrase in 2 Corinthians 2:8: "We are not ignorant of Satan's schemes." Two things about this sentence caught my attention. First, "not ignorant" suggests that we have some knowledge concerning Satan's ploys, though not necessarily thorough knowledge about every one of them. In other words, "we know the general way that Satan operates." Second, Paul does not say, "We are not ignorant of this scheme" (in the context, unforgiveness), but "of Satan's schemes," plural.  In other words, we are familiar with the type of weapon that Satan uses.

How can this be? Personally, I'm convinced that at least one reason is that Satan works primarily through existing conditions and weaknesses. I'm not saying that he never works supernaturally, but that Satan's usual method is to attack through existing means. James  1:14 describes temptation as being lured and enticed by one's own lust. Guess what? In this case, Satan doesn't even appear in the equation!  While in a general sense, temptation is certainly one of "Satan's schemes," he is simply neither powerful nor interested enough to be directly involved in the minor details of our lives. (On the other hand, our infinitely loving and powerful  God is!)

To be fair, the examples of Job, David, and Jesus all prove that Satan is at least sometimes directly involved in temptation. But even in these times, we see the attack directed toward existing fears, desires or tendencies. Job acknowledged, "That which I greatly feared has come upon me." Scholars generally agree that David's sin in taking a census of Israel was based on his desire for a strong military protection. And in tempting Jesus, Satan appealed to Jesus' hunger and human desire to avoid the pain of rejection and crucifixion. So even these are examples of Satan tempting through existing conditions.

Maybe this helps explain the numerous places in Scripture where we are warned to "watch yourselves" or to "pay attention to yourselves" in order to avoid turning away from God. The better we understand ourselves, the better prepared we are to resist Satan's devices. 

1. You can help guard against temptation by being realistic about your weaknesses. In fact, you probably already know where your weaknesses are - expect temptation in those areas.
2. Unexpected or especially recurring temptations generally have underlying causes. By understanding these causes, you can understand the temptation and thus be better prepared to handle it. For example, having a hard time standing up against negative peer pressure may stem from a strong desire to be accepted; self-centeredness may be fueled by a need to be respected. Recognizing that Satan's answers will never satisfy God-given desires can help you guard against temptation in whatever area you struggle.
3. Just saying "Satan's really tempting me" may be accurate (at least in a very general sense), but it does not help you find a way to handle the temptation. It directs your attention away from what you can control (yourself) and toward what you cannot control (Satan's activity). Instead, try praying that God will help you recognize what it is that makes this temptation especially strong for you.

 The ability to live the Christian life ultimately comes from Christ, not yourself. What I'm describing is a tool, not the whole workshop - but it's a tool that God has given us to use, that Scripture commands us to use, and that we overlook at our own peril.